Can one of the resident scholars settle a disagreement about the current JW practice of "marking"?
My understanding is that marking works this way: Suppose Annie is a JW who persists in an activity that is strongly frowned upon by the Society--but is not a DF-ing offense (for example, she is dating a non-witness), then Annie gets counseled by the elders. If Annie continues to date the unbeliever, then the elders may decide to "mark" her.
This is done via a "marking talk." Basically, it's a local needs part on the Service Meeting. An elder explicitly states during the talk that it is a marking talk. The elder describes the type of activity that is going on, but does not name the individual who is being marked. Anyone in the congregation who knows that Annie is dating an unbeliever is expected to limit their association with her. But Annie can still go out in service and do other "theocratic" activities with the congregation.
A friend told me that the JWs don't do marking like this anymore. Am I right, or is he?